- ACTIVE SKY NEXT DOWNLOAD INSTALL
- ACTIVE SKY NEXT DOWNLOAD UPDATE
- ACTIVE SKY NEXT DOWNLOAD UPGRADE
- ACTIVE SKY NEXT DOWNLOAD PLUS
New networking design eliminating the need for SimConnect configuration in networked environments – Just install ASP3D, install the included Connector on the server machine, configure your shared paths, and go! New P3D add-on folder specification/design, with everything installed outside of the P3D folders – Includes ASCA support (with SP3 Update) New 5.1 and 5.2-specific EA enhancements including additional cloud transition smoothing, volumetric fog/visibility handling and smoothing, and volumetric cloud depiction configuration options. New P3D Enhanced Atmospherics (EA) integration for improved synthesis, depiction, interpolation, and flight plan awareness. Many of the back-end systems of ActiveSky have been completely redesigned or overhauled for ASP3D
ACTIVE SKY NEXT DOWNLOAD UPDATE
ASP3D evolves realism-based weather simulation, building upon the ground-breaking and proven features of ActiveSky while integrating with the latest simulator platform update from Lockheed Martin: Prepar3D v5.2 HF1.
ACTIVE SKY NEXT DOWNLOAD PLUS
Check there first, plus they have incremental updates so you don’t have to uninstall and reinstall the whole product.Please choose your preferred ASP3D reseller:ĪSP3D is the latest addition to the ActiveSky weather engine line. PS - I believe some of these update notifications are actually behind the latest versions available from HiFi. I’d be interested to hear other people’s opinions of AS16.
ACTIVE SKY NEXT DOWNLOAD UPGRADE
But is it worth the full upgrade price? Pondering that, I guess I’d have to say yes if that what it takes to keep HiFi in business turning out such great products, patches and quick P3D updates. By extension so is AS16, and is made better by having ASCA coupled with it. Something about the colours used.ĪSCA is nice in that it varies the cloud texture set you’re seeing over longer flights, but the clouds themselves are arguably more prone to repetition and less refined than those of Texture Direct with Soft Clouds.Ī lot of this is down to personal opinion, not forgetting that I simply won’t fly without Active Sky something running. The interface has been reworked, and while it’s clearer in places, the map display (ie the most important one) is in my mind actually harder to interpret and read. It does seem to be a little better after the recent patches but again it’s hard to truly judge things. It also tends to go off at times that don’t totally make sense. The new wisp effect sometimes looks OK and other times looks, well, kinda contrived and forced. So while reducing cloud density a notch triggers an AS16 warning about not getting the full effects, I think it actually looks better as I no longer have to deal with the overcast wall of nothing.
I’ve recently turned clouds in P3D down from max to high to counter the crippling effect of SGSS that I need to make P3D look good. I found myself dealing with this wall of nothing very very frequently and it appeared to run counter to the METARs in question. But personally, to my mind and based upon my experience, it’s overdone. There’s a much more prevalent overcast effect - basically where you cannot see anything. I guess the test is that apart from the occasional popcorn and some cloud repetition, which was worse at launch I think, there’s nothing there that I look at and think “eh?” They say it’s better, and after flying it a while I kinda think it’s better. Maybe it looks better, but I’m wary of wishful thinking applying here. Is the weather depiction better than ASN? It’s really hard to say without doing a side by side comparison. To be honest I’m not completely and utterly sold on the upgrade and the revised per-platform pricing, though I can appreciate why they’ve done it.
I upgraded from ASN to AS16 & ASCA not long after it was launched, coming from an ASN / Texture Direct 4 with Soft Clouds setup.
An another topic - anyone using Active Sky 2016 and is it worth the upgrade?
0 kommentar(er)
